You were there before me! Ellen Brown
The other day, while idly browsing the web, I came across your 1971 MA thesis. What an outstanding and farsighted piece of work! —I took many notes. Has it ever been published? Extraordinary how little the money world has really changed since those days, which I naively tend to think of as a Keynesian golden age compared to what came after. Ronald Wright
I agree with Wright that your thesis is both cogent and prescient. Dr. Tom Hilton
The Economics of Human Energy
M.A. in Area Studies ( United States)
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. Towards order in the state. . .
II. The Beast with a Hundred Legs
III. To build the city. . .
IV. The True Base of Credit
No one can understand history without understanding economics. . .
My generation (that born in the 1880's) was dragged up in black ignorance of economics. . .
Nor has the situation altered. Money controls our lives more than ever, but intellectuals continue to shun the “dismal science”. Even those who are concerned with “values” neglect the social effects of value made quantitative.
Professional economists, moreover, are not much given to examining their premises: they assume that the motivations of capitalists are those of the human race. As David T. Bazelon explains,
Economics is concerned with values, real or make-believe, and therefore . . . psychology lies at the basis of both the theory and the practice of the discipline. All the great systems of economic thought, rest . . . on various assumptions as to human motivation. 1
At the heart of economics lies money; perhaps the economist can at least tell us something definite about what it is and how it functions. But according to R.W. Clower,
. . . contemporary monetary theory is among the least-settled branches of economic analysis and no serious student of modern economics can afford to be ignorant of this fact. 2
Some of the confusion is deliberate. Ezra Pound quotes a letter from Rothschild Bros., written in 1863:
“Very few people will understand this. Those who do will be occupied in making profits. The general public will probably not see it's against their interest.” 3
It seems that, if we are to learn something of how money really functions, we must look elsewhere.
Our discussion will deal first with Brooks Adams and Ezra Pound, two American authors who believe that what is usually described as a “healthy economy” is a contradiction in terms. Adams was the first American historian to see money as the operative influence on social institutions since the Middle Ages. Pound, through contact with A.S. Orage and Major C.H. Douglas, became interested in economics in 1910. He did not discover Adams until 1940 4 but many of their opinions are strikingly similar, particularly concerning money-lenders,
Robert Theobald is the only professional economist of the three. Although his model of a desirable economic system is quite different from Pound's, they share a common concern with equitable distribution and a belief that something other than greed can direct social policy.
Our analysis will be partly historical, partly prescriptive. Running through it like a golden thread will be an attempt to discover what money was, is, and could be.
1 Bazelon, The Paper Economy, p.118
2 Clover, Monetary Theory, p.7
3 Pound, Canto 46/79-82
4 Stock, Life of Ezra Pound p 382
John Whiting can be reached HERE